![]() ![]() ![]() Note: RISAConnection (when launched from within RISA-3D) using the RISA-3D type of license calls. So, both things could explain how there could be differences in the way the licensing of that program works. Also, it's licensing is handled using a "library" rather than being directly embedded in the program. ![]() RISAConnection v 9.0.2, on the other hand was released a number of months earlier. Very rare, but when it happens, the user wouldn't get any warning. So, the installation routine couldn't install the update for 6.0.2 and the exe still says 6.0.0. Where the user didn't realize that there was a RISAFoundation process running in the background when they installed. Correct? Note: one of the reasons why I asked you to look at the version imprinted on the EXE itself, is that I've seen cases where the exe didn't get properly installed. So, I can't see any reason why they wouldn't work the same.īut, you're saying that 3D works and foundation doesn't. 3D v 15.0.2 and Foundation 9.0.2 should have all the same internal calls for the hardware key. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |